Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49356 (AP)

Kankanalapalli Satyanarayana @ Chinna, v. Inkoti Veerabhadra Rao

WA/1900/2017 · 2025-05-04

K Manmadha Rao, R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

LI'; IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO Oo A & a- * AND THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA WRIT APPEAL NO: 1900 OF 2017 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 24.04.2017 in W.P.M.P. Nos. 55078 & 55081 of 2016 in W.P.No.44654 of 2016 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1. Kankanalapalli Satyanarayana @ Chinna, S/o Venkatappa Rao, aged about 80 years. 2. Boddani Sattibabu, S/o Appa Rao, aged about 40 years. 3. Mogili Rama Devi, W/o Venkataramana, aged about 34 years. All are residents of Unduru Village, Samalkot Mandal, East Godavari District. ...APPELLANTS/ PROPOSED RESPONDENT Nos.7 to 9 AND 1. Inkoti Veerabhadra Rao, S/o Burayya, R/o Prakasaraopeta, Unduru Village, Samalkot Mandal, East Godavari Dist. ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER- 2. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary, Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector & District Magistrate, East Godavari District at Kakinada. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kakinada, East Godavari District. 5. The Tahasildar, Samalkot Mandal, Samalkot, East Godavari District. ;. 6. The Andhra Pradesh Bhoodan Yagna Board, rep. by its Chairman, , Gandhi Bhavan, Hyderabad. ' 7. The Secretary, The Andhra Pradesh Bhoodan Yagna Board, Gandhi Bhavan, Hyderabad. ■ I ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS' I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017rWAMP. NO: 3684 OF 2017) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 21.12.2016 passed in W.P.No.44654 of 2016 as extended vide order dated 24.4.2017, pending final disposal of the writ appeal. ^ Counsel for the Appellants; SRI V. S. R. ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI T V JAGGI REDDY‘S Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 & 7:— The Court made the following: JUDGMENT 1 APHC010760182017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3525] MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT APPEAL NO: 1900/2017 t \ Between: j Kankanalapalli Satyanarayana @ Chinna, and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Inkoti Veerabhadra Rao and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.VS R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2.TVJAGGI REDDY The Court made the following Judgment: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) This Writ Appeal has been filed against an interim order, dated 24.04.2017, wherein the interim direction, dated 21.12.2016, was extended till further orders. 2 2. It is stated that the main Writ Petition is still pending 3. In view of the fact that the interim order has been continued to operate for the last eight years, is a sufficient reason to dismiss the present appeal. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- M. RAMESH BABU //TRUE COPY// DEPUTY REGISTRAR /r gt SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri V. S. R. Anjaneyalu, Advocate [OPUCJ^ 2. One CC to Sri T. V. Jaggi Reddy, Advocate [OPUC> 3. Two CC’s to GP for Revenue, High Court of A.P. at Amaravati[OUT] 4. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED;05/05/2025 JUDGMENT WA.No.1900 of 2017 DISMISSING THE W.A. WITHOUT COSTS