2025:UHC:8534 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS 525/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Mamta Bisht, Deputy AG, for the State. Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, Advocate, for the respondent no. 3. (2) Petitioner participated in a selection held by Uttarakhand Subordinate Services Selection Commission for the post of Assistant Teacher, LT Grade. Since the name of petitioner was not included in the list of successful candidates, therefore, she has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs: “i) Issue a writ of certiorari quashing the revised answer key dated 10.01.2025 insofar as revised answers to Question Nos. 12 and 13 of Booklet Series- C are concerned (Annexed at Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition). ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3 to review the revised answer key dated 10.01.2025, insofar as answers to Question Nos. 12 and 13 of Booklet Series-C are concerned and to eventually treat Option ‘B’ and ‘A’ as correct answers to Question No. 12 and 13 respectively, being in consonance with the initial answer key dated 24.08.2024. iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 3 to declare the petitioner as a selected 2025:UHC:8534 candidate and to recommend her name for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher (Arts) by amending the provisional recommendation list dated 09.02.2025 insofar as subject ‘Art’ for Assistant Teacher (LT Grade) is concerned.” (3) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition has already been dealt with and decided by coordinate Bench in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 232 of 2025. (4) Mr. Shailendra Nauriyal, learned Counsel appearing for the selecting body and Ms. Mamta Bisht, learned Deputy AG appearing for the respondent no. 1 and 2 concede that the issue raised in the present writ petition has been decided in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 232 of 2025. (5) Accordingly, in view of the consensus between learned Counsel for the parties, writ petition is decided in terms of the judgment dated 4.6.2025, rendered in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 232 of 2025. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 23.9.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d4625 03, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C6 7F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.09.23 17:52:55 +05'30' 2025:UHC:8534