[2025:RJ-JP:43541] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10426/2025 1. Ambika Daughter Of Shri Kishana Ram, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of House No. 1288, Ward No. 12, Tal Wala Bas, Parlika, 20 Ntr, Hanumangarh (Raj.) 2. Rakesh Kumar Mochee Son Of Shri Tara Chand Mochee, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 212, Targo Ka Mohalla, Ward No. 8, Mahajan, Bikaner (Raj.) 3. Raju Ram Meghwal Son Of Shri Sant Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of 152, Ward No. 02, Meghwalon Ka Mohalla, Chak, Phooldedar, Rojhan, Bikaner (Raj.) 4. Lakhveer Kaur Wife Of Shri Khushdeep Singh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of 19, Pbn-A Dingwala, Block Pilibanga, Hanumangarh (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bajrang Sepat for Mr. Komal Kumar Giri For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 30/10/2025 1. This writ petition is filed by the petitioners with following prayer:- (i) By issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction; Respondents may kindly be directed to include the names of petitioners in posting list dated 30.06.2025 and give posting to petitioners in MGGS [2025:RJ-JP:43541] (2 of 3) [CW-10426/2025] School being petitioners already selected candidates vide result/information dated 24.12.2024 and thereafter filing of district preference of petitioners under the advertisement dated 11.07.2024 in the MGSS english medium school. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring judgment dated 20.10.2023 in case of Vikram Singh and Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ No.16275/2023 and connected matters submitted that clause in the order of appointment restricting the reliving of the petitioner(s) was quashed and set aside. He further submits that the judgment is approved by Hon’ble Division Bench on 05.03.2024 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.53/2024. He further submits that the writ petition be disposed of in accordance with judgment in case of Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 3. Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondents and office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG as counsel for respondents. 4. Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG submits that the judgment in case of Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra) has attained finality and same has been implemented by the respondents. He submits that if the judgment is applicable on facts and circumstances of the case then the writ be disposed accordingly. 5. Having considered submission of learned counsel for the parties and also considering the material as placed on record, the writ petition preferred by petitioners is disposed of in terms of order dated 20.10.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16275/2023 Vikram Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan [2025:RJ-JP:43541] (3 of 3) [CW-10426/2025] & Ors. The clause in appointment order placing a restriction to relieve the petitioners is hereby quashed and set aside. 6. The respondents are directed to relieve the petitioners from their present position and permit them to join at the place(s), where they have been provided appointment by orders as mentioned in petition. 7. The instant writ petition and misc. application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /199