1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 339 of 2025 1 - Smt. Pet Dewangan Wd/o Late Ramlal Dewangan Aged About 60 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Mahamayi Ward, Arjunda, P.S. Arjunda, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ku. Sita Dewangan D/o Late Ramlal Dewangan Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 13, Mahamayi Ward, Arjunda, P.S. Arjunda, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ku. Smita Dewangan D/o Late Ramlal Dewangan Aged About 30 Years (Address Wrongly Mentioned In The Award) R/o Ward No. 13, Mahamayi Ward, Arjunda, P.S. Arjunda, Tahsil Gunderdehi, Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Mahesh Kumar Yadav S/o Kanhaiyyalal Yadav Aged About 19 Years R/o Sanjay Nagar, Dondilohara, Tahsil Dondilohara, Distt. Balod, Chhattisgarh. (Driver). 2 - Manoj Kumar Sahu S/o Chandra Kumar Sahu R/o Sanjay Nagar, Dondilohara, Tahsil Dondilohara, Distt. Balod, C.G., Presently R/o At Near Gajanand Mandir, Vishwakarma Chowk, Durg, P.S. Mohan Nagar Durg, Tahsil And Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Owner). 3 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited. Through Divisional Manager, R/o G.E. Road, Parmanand Bhawan, Near Rajendra Park, Durg, Tahsil And Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Insurer) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate. For Respondent(s) No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Gagan Tiwari, Advocate. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 For Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Hanuman Prasad Agrawal, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/11/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following prayer:- “It is, therefore, most humbly and respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to review the order dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure-P/1) passed by the Hon'ble Court and in M.A.C. No. 1793/2018 in the larger interest of justice..” 2. This review petition has been filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 30.6.2025 passed in MAC Nos. 1793/2018 & 1582/2018. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and after going through the record, I do not find any legal error apparent on the face of the record in the judgment under review. 4. Accordingly, the review petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat