Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49336 (AP)

T MANOHAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/12338/2021 · 2025-09-23

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010214242021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12338/2021 Between: 1. T MANOHAR, S/O. RAMACHADRAIAH. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.3-6, M. KONGARAVARIPALLI VILLAGE, MUNGILIPATTU POST, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL. CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, . REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. I IOME DEPARTMENT. AP SECRETARIAT. VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHANDRAGIRI PS, CHANDRAGIRI VILLAGE AND MANDAL. CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHANDRAGIRI CIRCLE,CHANDRAGIRI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. Y RAJENDRA NAIDU, S/O. LATE ANNAYYANAIDU. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. M. KONGARAVARIPALLI VILLAGE. MUNGILIPATTU POST, CHANDRAGIRI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in calling the Petitioner to the Chandragiri Police Station. at the instance of the 2 Respondent No.4 herein as illegal arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the Respondent No.2 and 3 herein not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station at the instance of the. Respondent No. 4 herein and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct' the Respondent No.2 and 3 herein not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station at the instance of the Respondent No.4 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SATYANARAYANA NIMMALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12338/2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in calling the Petitioner to the Chandragiri Police Station. at the instance of the Respondent No.4 herein as illegal arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the Respondent No.2 and 3 herein not to call the Petitioner to the Police Station at the instance of the. Respondent No. 4 herein and to pass…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents would submit that in the light of the interim Order passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 dated 29.06.2021, the respondent police are not calling the petitioner to the police station, since no crime has been registered against him. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the above said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of making the Interim Order as absolute. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.09.2025 UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.12338 of 2021 Dated.24.09.2025 UPS 212