Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49335 (ALL)

SRISHTY GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/13556/2025 · 2025-05-01

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:70022 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13556 of 2025 Petitioner :- Srishty Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahendra Bahadur Singh,Vijeta Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Akanksha Sharma,C.S.C. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Akansha Sharma, learned counsel for respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondent no.2 is not refunding the security money deposited by the petitioner for NEET Exam (UG)-2021. In respect to her grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent no.2, but respondent no.2 is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all her grievances before the respondent no.2-Director General, Medical Education & Training, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Sattyarth Digitally signed by :- SATTYARTH ANAND High Court of Judicature at Allahabad