1 2025:CGHC:55555 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5974 of 2025 1 - Harkh Lal Singh S/o Late Golichand Singh Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Anandpur Tahsil Sonhat District Korea C.G. --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Korea (Baikunthpur), District Korea C.G. 2 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sonhat, District Korea C.G. 3 - Tahsildar Tahsil Sonhat, District Korea C.G. 4 - Naib Tahsildar Ramgarh, Tahsil Sonhat, District Korea C.G. 5 - Parshottam Singh S/o Late Golichand Singh Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Anandpur, Tahsil Sonhat, District Korea C.G. --- Respondent(s) ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Mahendra K. Sahu, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1 to 4 : Mr. Anurag Tiwari, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 14/11/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2025.11.18 11:04:22 +0530 2 “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner from the possession of the respondents. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct to the Respondent No.4 (Naib Tahsildar) to decide and consider the pending Revenue Case No.202504013400030/A-70/2024-25 registered on the petitioner’s application dated 16.04.2025 filed under Section 250 of the CGLRC. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any other writ (s), order(s) or directions (s) which the Hon’ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to award the cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that this writ petition is filed on the ground that though petitioner has submitted an application under Section 250 of the C.G. Land Revenue Code,1959 (In short ‘the Code of 1959’) for his reinstatement, however, it is pending since long time, therefore, a direction be issued to concerned Tahsildar to conclude the proceedings initiated under Section 250 of the Code, 1959 on his application at the earliest. 3. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits, therefore, he is having no objection. 4. This Court is not deciding the rights of the parties, therefore, this petition is disposed of without issuing notice to respondent No.5. 5. Perusal of the record would show that application U/s. 250 of the Code,1959 was submitted on 16.04.2025. Further perusal of order- sheet would show that parties have caused appearance before the 3 Naib Tahsildar and the case as of now is pending awaiting the records from the higher court. 6. Considering the facts of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3/Naib Tahsildar to conclude the proceedings initiated on the application filed by petitioner under Section 250 of the Code, 1959 following due process of law expeditiously. It is expected from the respondent No.3 to take necessary steps to decide the application at the earliest, preferably within 8 (eight) months from the date of receipt of order following due process of law. 7. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram