Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49331 (ALL)

IMRAN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/13957/2025 · 2025-05-25

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:89463 Court No. - 67 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13957 of 2025 Applicant :- Imran Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mehdi Abbas,Mohd. Akbar Shah Alam Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. has been filed on behalf of applicant for bail in Case Crime No.41 of 2025, under Sections 333, 115(2), 109(1), 76 of B.N.S., Police Station - Shahpur, District - Muzaffar Nagar. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant has submitted that applicant is innocent person and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. It is further submitted that applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case due to ulterior motive. It is further submitted that as per the injury report, injury sustained by the injured person, is not threat to life. It is also submitted that applicant was admitted in hospital on 21.01.2025 and was discharged on the same day. It is also submitted that applicant is the man of clean antecedents and he has no previous criminal history. It is further submitted that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed on 11.04.2025 by the investigating officer and the court concerned has taken cognizance on 25.04.2025. Applicant is languishing in jail since 12.03.2025. 3. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts, it is prayed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant that applicant may be released on bail in the aforesaid crime. It is undertaken by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant shall abide by all terms and conditions as imposed by this Court. 4. Per contra, learned AGA vehemently opposed the bail application of applicant, but he has not contradicted the facts as stated by learned counsel for the applicant during arguments. 5. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Maurya, Advocate holding brief of Sri Mehdi Abbas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant, Sri S.K. Ojha, learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State, perused the contents made in bail application and material available on record. 6. I have gone through the contents made in the bail application as well as the documents appended with the bail application and perused the affidavit. It is admitted fact that after completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed and the court concerned has also taken cognizance. One of the injuries, sustained by the injured is grievous in nature, but not threat to life. There is no previous criminal history against the applicant. Applicant is languishing in jail since 12.03.2025. There are dim chance for conclusion of trial in near future. There is no material brought by learned AGA to establish that if applicant would be enlarged on bail he will influence the trial or the witnesses. Applicant is the permanent resident of address given in memo of bail application and there is no flight risk. 7. Taking into consideration all the entirety of the matter as discussed above, without expressing any finding or opinion on merits of the case, the applicant is releasing on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant - Imran, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence. (ii) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the Trial Court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C./351 B.N.S.S. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 26.5.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad