Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Kerala · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4933 (KER)

VALSAKUMAR, v. DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR),

WP(C)/11309/2025 · 2025-03-20

Ziyad Rahman A A

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:KER:28943 WP(C) No.11309 OF 2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 11309 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: VALSAKUMAR, AGED 80 YEARS S/O. THE LATE P.K. KUMARAN, PULLARKAT, TEMPLE ROAD, THRIKKAKARA P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682021 BY ADVS. NINU M.DAS S.A.ANAND RESPONDENT/S: 1 DEPUTY COLLECTOR (RR), RDO UNDER SECTION 2(XVA) FOR KANAYANOOR TALUK, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030 2 THE TAHSILDAR(LR), KANAYANNOOR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682011 3 THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682033 4 THE AGRICULTURAL OFFICER AND THE CONVENOR OF THE LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE KRISHIBHAVAN, KALAMASSERY, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682030 OTHER PRESENT: Smt.Amminikutty.K, Sr.G.P THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: 2025:KER:28943 WP(C) No.11309 OF 2025 2 J U D G M E N T The petitioner is the absolute owner and in possession 98 Ares 76 Sq Meter of land comprised in Sy No. 308/1 of Thrikkakara North Village In Kanayannur Taluk in Block No. 006 Ernakulam District. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the property was wrongly described as ‘Nilam’ in the revenue records even though the same was excluded from the Data Bank. The Form 5 application submitted by the petitioner to remove the property from the Data Bank was allowed. Therefore, an application in Form 7 which is produced as Ext.P1 dated 05.12.2024 has been submitted by him, before the 1st respondent, and it is now pending consideration. The limited prayer sought by the petitioner is to direct the 1st respondent to pass orders thereon within a time frame. 3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispose of this writ petition. 2025:KER:28943 WP(C) No.11309 OF 2025 3 Accordingly it is ordered that, the 3rd respondent shall forward a report as to the nature of the property of the petitioner, to the 1st respondent, the authorized officer under Section 2(xvA) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment and thereupon, the 1st respondent, the authorized officer shall take up Ext.P1 application and appropriate orders thereon shall be passed in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of such report. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE SM/0404 2025:KER:28943 WP(C) No.11309 OF 2025 4 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11309/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 05.12.2024 UNDER FORM 7 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL TRUE COPY P.A.TO JUDGE