APHC010468402021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 28258/2021 Between: 1. AMAR AMRIT TRAVEL, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SANDEEP SINGH, DESIGNER COMPLEX, 130 DR NANJAPPA ROAD, COIMBATORE 641018 2. SANDEEP SINGH, S/O. HARJIT SINGH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC.BUSINESS ADDRESS, 130 DR NANJAPPA. ROAD, COIMBATORE 641018 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI. 2. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU II TOWN PS ANANTHAPUR 3. ICICI BANK LTD, REP BY ITS MANAGER, GKR BUILDING, 693, OPPANAKARA STREET, COIMBATORE - 641001 4. AXIS BANK LTD, REP BY ITS MANAGER, SAI BABA COLONY BRANCH, COIMBATORE – 641011. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. P BADRINATH 3. SAI KRISHNA SRINIVAS G The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 3rd and 4th Respondents in blocking / freezing the current accounts of Petitioners bearing Account Nos.605305057020 and 916020023623440 on the directions of the 2nd Respondent, without any evidence, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and in violation of principles of natural justice and set aside the same and to consequently direct the 3rd and 4th Respondents to immediately unblock the current accounts of the Petitioners in the interest of justice.” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that, in view of the interim order dated 07.12.2021 in I.A.No.1 of 2021 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, the Petitioners are permitted to operate their bank accounts and withdraw the amount, which is not involved in the subject crime. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri S. Vivek Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy with regard to the disputed amount before the concerned Court in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.28258 of 2021 Dt.16.10.2025 Dinesh