NISHA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/4257/2025 · 2025-04-29
Manisha Batra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49321 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49321 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-4257-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CRWP-4257-2025(O&M) Date of Decision: 29.04.2025 NISHA DEVI AND ANOTHER ....Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present : Mr. Lalit Mohan Barara, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. DAG, Haryana. MANISHA BATRA, J. (Oral)
1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents No.2 & 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondent Nos. 4 to 9 and take action on their representation dated 18.04.2025 (Annexure P-4). 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that they are major. They are in love. Their parents are against their relationship and threats have even been extended to petitioner No.1 by her parents and relatives to kill her. She has left her house and has started living with the petitioner No.1 in live-in-relationship. Apprehending danger to their lives and liberty, they sent representation dated 18.04.2025 to the respondent No.2 but the same has not been taken into consideration and hence, the present petition. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. The petitioners’ counsel is directed to supply the copy of the petition to him. Deepak Patwal 2025.04.30 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-4257-2025(O&M) 2
5. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned State counsel without going into the question of validity of their relationship and without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also with regard to the sanctity of relationship or age of the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Yamunanagar, District Yamunanagar, Haryana to look into the matter and dispose of the representation dated 18.04.2025 (Annexure P-4) in accordance with law and also to take necessary step, if any, genuine threat to life and liberty of the petitioners is found. 6. A copy of this order along with copy of representation dated 18.04.2025 (Annexure P-4) be sent to respondent No.2, so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously. 7.
It is made clear that this order shall not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. ( MANISHA BATRA ) 29.04.2025 JUDGE Deepak Patwal
1. Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
2. Whether reportable Yes/No Deepak Patwal 2025.04.30 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document