APHC010372032013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3549] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 20415/2013 Between: 1. CH. NAGA NARASIMHA RAO, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, S/O KANAKA DURGA RAO LATE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC : MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER GRADE I ADHOC, TADEPALLIGUDEM MUNICIPALITY, R/O TADEPALLIGUDEM, WESTGODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY M A U D DEPT HYDERABAD 6 OTHERS, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.A. & U.D. DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD and others ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mr. P S RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Mr. C SRINIVASA BABA (SC FOR APPSC) 2. Mr. D BALA KISHAN RAO 3. Mr. KARANKI YASWANTH 4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV 5. Mr. V MAHESWAR REDDY NJS,J & GTK,J W.P Nos.20415 and 21185 of 2013 2 APHC010372032013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3549] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 21185/2013 Between: 1. CH. NAGA NARASIMHA RAO, W.G. DIST, S/O KANAKA DURGA RAO LATE, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC : MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER GRADE I ADHOC, TADEPALLIGUDEM MUNICIPALITY, R/O TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY MAUD DEPT HYD 5 OT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, M.A. & U.D. DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD and 5 others ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mr. P S RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Mr. C SRINIVASA BABA (SC FOR APPSC) 2. Mr. KARANKI YASWANTH 3. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV NJS,J & GTK,J W.P Nos.20415 and 21185 of 2013 3 This Court made the following Common Order: Ms. A Priyanka, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions submits that the matters have become infructuous. 2. Recording the same, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA ____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date:23.09.2025 Ksj