[2025:RJ-JP:43535] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14808/2025 Dinesh Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Jodala Kuaa Ki Dhani, Bassi, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Skill Planning And Entrepreneurships Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. (Raj.) 2. The Director, Directorate Of Technical Education, (Training, E-6, Residence Road, Jodhpur (Raj.) 3. The Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Rajya Krishi Prabandhan Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur Through Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.S. Gouttam with Ms. Sakshi Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari for R-3 and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Takar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 30/10/2025 1. Mr. Sandeep Maheshwari for respondent No.3 and Mr. Jitendra Kumar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG on behalf of respondent No.1 and 2 accepts notice. Office is directed to reflect their names in the cause list as counsel for the respondents. 2. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “a) The Hon'ble Court may kindly be declare illegal action of the respondents by which respondents without decided the objection submitted by the petitioner on [2025:RJ-JP:43535] (2 of 3) [CW-14808/2025] 30.01.2025 regarding question No. 51 and as per master booklet question No. 64 publish final said examination answer key 03.06.2025; b) Further may kindly directed to respondents to consider right answer of question No. 51 and in model paper question No. 64 which is choose by the petitioner i.e. Core of conductor, as per the answer key of earlier examination and book/guide and award marks for said question or constitute expert committee regarding said question; c) Further the respondents may kindly be directed that award marks to the petitioner for said question and after awarding the marks to petitioner, petitioner may be appointed on the post of Jr. Instructor trade electrician if he fall in merit under said recruitment; d) Any other appropriate order, or direction which this Hon'ble court deem fit and proper in favour of the appellant may also kindly be passed.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has raised grievances regarding Question No.51 and also about Model Booklet Question No.64 regard Core of Conductor. 4. Having considering submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with liberty to the writ petitioner to submit a representation which would be considered by the respondents after taking from well known expert from MNIT, Jaipur. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation after considering the material referred by petitioner and also taking advice from well known expert from MNIT, Jaipur but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are [2025:RJ-JP:43535] (3 of 3) [CW-14808/2025] under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/46