[2025:RJ-JP:48356] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17620/2024 Madan Lal Sharma S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 71 Years, R/o Mohalla Jatti Ki Bageechee, Near Girls School, Manni Ka Bad, Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Commissioner, Panchyati Raj Department, Jaipur. 2. Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Alwar. 4. Development Officer Panchayat Samiti, Ramgarh, Distt. Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the order dated 7.8.2024 as also the order dated 25.11.2020 so far as they relate to the petitioner and adversely affect his rights, may kindly be quashed and set-aside and the respondents may also be directed to give due service and other benefits in cash to the petitioner by granting pay scale of Rs. 5000- [2025:RJ-JP:48356] (2 of 3) [CW-17620/2024] 8000, 5500-9000, 6500-10500 on completion of requisite years of service from the date of his initial appointment, as have been given to other similarly situated employees. Accordingly, the petitioner's salary and pension be revised and the arrears whereof be paid to him alongwith interest @12% р.а. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order dated 29.08.2019 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14630/2019 (Babu Lal Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, on the basis of judgment in case of Raj Kumar Agrawal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5400/2015 decided on 12.04.2017. He further submits that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG accepts notice. Office is directed to reflect his name as counsel for the respondents. 4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of the case of Babu Lal Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) passed by this Court, if applicable upon facts of the case. [2025:RJ-JP:48356] (3 of 3) [CW-17620/2024] 5. The writ petition is disposed of on basis of facts as claimed by the petitioner, however, the respondents are at liberty to consider applicability of ratio in case of Raj Kumar Agrawal (supra), only if applicable upon facts as claimed by the petitioner. 6. The writ petition and misc. application, if any, stand disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/87