APHC010191932003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 6841/2003 Between: 1. B. RAJASEKHAR, S/O. LATE B. VENKATARAMANA R/O. D.NO. 15/164, HABEEBULLAH STREET, CUDDAPAH, ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DISTRRICT COLLECTOR, CUDDAPAH CUDDAPAH DISTRICT 2. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION, CUDDAPAH CUDDAPAH DISTRICT 3. THE CORRESPONDENT, S.K.M. JUNIOR COLLEGE SIDDAVATHAM, CUDDAPAH DISTRICT 4. GOVT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in not considering case of petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds in any suitable post in 3rd respondent college is arbitrary, illegal, and violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to rules and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate grounds in any suitable post in 3rd respondent college and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 8907 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation of petitioner dated 24-12-2002 and 25-11-2002 for appointment on compassionate grounds in any suitable post in 3rd respondent college pending disposal of above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION 3 The Court made the following order: Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 11.09.2025 and 11.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting his case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 25.09.2025 MP 4 187 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:6841 of 2003 Date: 25.09.2025 MP