Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49297 (RAJ)

LOKPAL SHARMA v. STATE MEDICAL AND HEALTHORS

CW/9198/2014 · 2025-11-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46785] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9198/2014 Lokpal Sharma S/o Biharilal Sharma, By Caste Brahmin, Village Dholarada, Post Talab, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary To The Govt. Medical And Health Services, Jaipur Rajasthan 2. The Director Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Alwar. 4. Medical Officer In Charge, Community Health Center, Tehla, District Alwar. 5. Navdisha Sainik Kalyan Cooperative Scoiety, Rath Nagar, Alwar, Rajasthan Through Its Secretary. 6. Ramesh Chand S/o Not Known, Village Tehla, Post Tehla, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sweekriti Sharma, for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/11/2025 The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner chal- lenging the order dated 27.08.2014 (Annexure-5) by which one Ramesh Chand was appointed as driver on contract basis in place of Lokpal Sharma through Navdisha Sainik Kalyan Cooperative So- ciety Ltd. (Alwar). [2025:RJ-JP:46785] (2 of 2) [CW-9198/2014] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the pe- titioner was working on contract basis, he could not have been re- placed by a person on contract basis. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the drivers at the relevant time were being hired through place- ment agency. The contract with the placement agency, through which the petitioner was hired, came to end and a new contract was assigned to other placement agency by which the other per- son namely Ramesh Chand was engaged as driver on contract ba- sis. Considered the submission made at bar and perused the ma- terial available on record. Since the contract with the placement agency through which the petitioner was hired as driver on contract basis has already come to end, no right can be claimed by the petitioner in view of the contract of which period has already come to end. The court finds no merits in this petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. All pending application/s, if any, also stand/s disposed off. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Shruti/ Gaurav Srivastava /62