[2025:RJ-JP:47280] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17877/2025 Pranjal Gothwal S/o H.s. Gothwal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o 4H- 463, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Mines And Petroleum Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Directorate Of Mines And Geology Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 21/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: 1. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed that the revised/Final answer key along with report of experts of Geologist may kindly be uploaded on its official website. 2. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to give proper marks to the petitioner for the disputed [2025:RJ-JP:47280] (2 of 3) [CW-17877/2025] question No. 139 by considering his evidence in right perspective as well as by deciding the objections submitted by the candidates. 3. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, impugned result dated 01.10.2025 of Geologist be declared illegal and same be quashed and set aside as same has been issued without issuance of final answer key. 4. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, direct the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner if petitioner on the post of Geologist, after correcting the wrong answers in the answer key and award proper marks to the petitioner. 5. Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioner. 6. Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10622/2014 titled as “Ramdhan Kumawat Vs. State of Rajasthan” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order, which was relied in case of Nisha Panwar Vs. RSSB: SBCWP No. 14401/2021 decided on 19.03.2024. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Ramdhan Kumawat (supra) passed by this Court. [2025:RJ-JP:47280] (3 of 3) [CW-17877/2025] 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /46