Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49293 (RAJ)

MUKESH S/O RAMJILAL v. KISHAN LAL S/O JAGANNATH

CRES/405/2019 · 2025-10-29

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:43422] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 405/2019 In S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.6056/2018 1. Mukesh S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Bhakrota, Police Station Sadar, Dausa Rajasthan 2. Babulal S/o Laxman Singh, Resident Of Sodala, Police Station Bandikui, Rajasthan ----Appellants/Claimants Versus 1. Kishan Lal S/o Jagannath, Aged About 38 Years, 2. Ajay Kumar S/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 17 Years, 3. Monika D/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 13 Years, 4. Harsh S/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 10 Years, Claimants No. 2 To 4 Minor Through Natural Guardian Father Kishanlal, Dhandarej Mod, Dhani, Dhonya, Teh. And District Dausa 5. H.d.f.c. Ergo General Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, 4th Floor, Sangvi Upasana Tower, C-98, Near Ahinsa Circle, Subhash Marg, C- Scheme, Jaipur ----Respondents/Defendants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shankar Lal for Mr. G.L. Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 29/10/2025 A Co-Ordinate Bench of this Court while allowing the present restoration application vide order dated 30.05.2024, directed the appellants to deposit cost of Rs.2,000/- with the Rajasthan High [2025:RJ-JP:43422] (2 of 2) [CRES-405/2019] Court Munshi Association, Jaipur, within three weeks of passing of the order. It has since come on record that even after passing of more than 17 months, the cost amount has not been deposited by the appellants. Such contemptible laxity cannot be permitted. In view of the above, the present restoration application is dismissed for non-payment of costs. All pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Sudha/49