APHC010633992022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1138/2023 Between: 1. G SRIDHAR GOPALA KRISHNA, S/O G. RAMMOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, ENGINEER AND CLASS I CONTRACTOR, RIO D.NO.59A-21-7/1A, FLAT NO.203, VENKAT MEADOWS, R.R. GARDENS, PATAMATA, VIJAYAWADA - 520 007, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SASIBHUSHAN KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI S S RAWAT IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI SRINIVASA REDDY, PAY AND ACCOUNT OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, D.NO.29-02-52, MANASA COMPLEX, RAMAMANDIRAM STREET, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA - 2, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI SASI BHUSHAN KUMAR, THE COMMISSIONER, COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (CADA) AND SPECIAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, NAMBOORIVARI STREET, HANUMANPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 520003. 5. SRI S TIRUMALA RAO, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE (MAJOR IRRIGATION), WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. SRI K SRINIVASA RAO, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRAINAGE DIVISION, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to the Respondents / Contemnors herein and to punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for their wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Hon'ble Court in WP No.19025 of 2022, dated 25.07.2022 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT CHALASANI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S NISCHALA REDDY 2. S SIVA KUMARI The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of the Court have been complied with. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J 26.09.2025 MJA 261 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1138 of 2023 26.09.2025 MJA