Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49289 (RAJ)

BALHIT SIKSHA SAMITI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/3826/2023 · 2025-10-27

Sanjeet Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42948] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3826/2023 Balhit Siksha Samiti, Swami Dayanand Marg, Alwar (Raj.) Through Its President Brij Bhushan Gupta Son Of Shri Gyanchand Gupta 62 Years, Resident Of 11 Moti Dungri Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary To The Government, Department Of Education, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.) 3. Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.P. Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devansh Sharma, Dy. G.C HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 27/10/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner-institution has made a limited prayer that the short controversy involved in the present case can be decided by directing the respondents to decide the application/representation of the petitioner in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the petitioner-institution submits that in view of the directions given by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in the case of State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. The Management Committee Sh. Bhagwan Das Todi College: D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.663/2015, the petitioner- institution is entitled for payment of amount of grant-in-aid which has already been paid by the petitioner-institution to the employees working on the aided post in execution proceedings. [2025:RJ-JP:42948] (2 of 2) [CW-3826/2023] Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the said prayer, however, submits that due payment can be made on verification of the claim submitted by the petitioner-institution, which requires a detailed application/representation along with the necessary proof regarding employment of the concerned employees in the petitioner-institution as well as the proof regarding payment being made by the petitioner-institution. In view of the submissions so made by the respective parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner-institution to submit a detailed application /representation to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 raising its claim and while attaching the necessary documents such as the proof of employment so also the proof of payment being made and other necessary documents as desired by the respondents. The said application/representation shall be made within a period of 15 days from today. The respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to consider and decide the application/representation of the petitioner-institution as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 3 months from the date of receipt of the said application/representation in accordance with law and accordingly shall make payment of the amount of grant-in-aid to the petitioner-institution within the time stipulated above. The present writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J AVINASH GULERIA /14