- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52283 RFA No. 1968 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1968 OF 2011 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI. M NARAYANAREDDY SON OF.LATE VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VIJAY GOWDA L, ADVOCATE FOR LRS OF APPELLANT (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. MANJUNATHA REDDY SON OF M NARAYANA REDDY RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133. 2. SMT G KAVITHA WIFE OF LATE VENKATESH REDDY RESIDING AT PAPPIREDDYPALYA DANKANIKOTE TALUK, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU STATE - 581 151. 3. KUMARI. MAMTHA DAUGHTER OF KARIAHA AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, MINOR, RESIDING AT PAPPIREDDYPALYA DANKANIKOTE TALUK, DHARMAPURI DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU STATE - 581 151. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52283 RFA No. 1968 of 2011 4. SRI. HEMANTHA REDDY SON OF M NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133. 5. SMT. M RADHAMMA DAUGHTER OF M NARAYANA REDDY RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133. 6. SRI. MUNIKRISHNA REDDY SON OF M NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133. 7. SRI. PRATHIBHA DAUGHTER OF M NARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK - 562 133. 8. SMT.MUNIYAMMA, DAUGHTER OF LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, RESIDING AT TUBARAHALLI VILLAGE VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK – 562 113. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R. SHAILESH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. R. NARAYANA, ADVOCATE FOR R8; R2, R5, R6, R7 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED; VIDE ORDER DATED 12.08.2013, NOTICE TO R4 IS HELD SUFFICIENT; R3 IS MINOR AND REPRESENTED BY R8) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52283 RFA No. 1968 of 2011 THIS RFA IS FILED U/O-41, R-1, R/W, SEC.96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 08.09.2011 PASSED IN O.S.4390/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIII-ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-44, BANGALORE, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR THE PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None appears for the appellants. Amendment is not carried out. Cost is not paid vide Court order dated 14.11.2025 and 02.12.2025. Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 0