[2025:RJ-JP:46650] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13696/2025 Narottam Prajapati S/o Ramkalyan, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Lanka Colony Baran, Thana Kotwali Baran, District Baran (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail Baran) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Buddhi Prakash Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 19/11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.477/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Baran, District Baran for offence under Section 307, 34 of IPC and 3/25 of Arms Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that no recovery of firearm or any weapon has been effected at the instance of the present petitioner and no specific act was attributed in the FIR as well as testimony recorded during trial. He argued that prime accused Bharat Prajapati @ Bittu against whom the allegation of causing injuries by using firearm has been enlarged on bail by the co-ordinate bench of this Court on [2025:RJ-JP:46650] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13696/2025] 28.08.2024. He again submits that though there are pendency of 12 cases, but in 4 cases the petitioner has been acquitted and in all other cases he is on bail. He submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since April 2024. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Narottam Prajapati S/o Ramkalyan, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Police Station Kotwali Baran, District Baran in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. [2025:RJ-JP:46650] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13696/2025] (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future. (iii) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/113