Ramachandiran v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/13896/2025 · 2025-04-30
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49272 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49272 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.13896 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.13896 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.9296 of 2025
1. Ramachandiran
2. Udhaya Chandru
3. Muniyasamy
4. Ranjith ... Petitioners Vs State represented by Inspector of Police, Perumanallur Police Station, Tiruppur. (Crime No.783 of 2021) ... Respondent Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of B.N.N.S., to set aside the impugned order dated 07.02.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.10 of 2025 in S.C.No.98 of 2022 on the file of II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur and to allow the above Criminal Original Petition. For Petitioners : Mr.B.Prashanth Nadaraj For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.13896 of 2025 O R D E R This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 07.02.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.10 of 2025 in S.C.No.98 of 2022 on the file of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur, thereby dismissing the petition to recall PW.1 to PW.3 for further cross-examination.
2. Heard the learned counsel for both sides and perused the materials available on record.
3. On a perusal of the records, it is revealed that the petitioners are the accused, and they are facing trial in S.C.No.98 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 302 r/w 114, 352, and 506(2) of IPC. The prosecution had examined PW.1 to PW.14. PW.1 to PW.3 were examined on
26.09.2023. Thereafter, on 05.01.2024, they were fully cross-examined by the petitioners. Even then, once again the petitioner filed a petition to recall PW.1 to PW.3 for further cross-examination. Therefore, it is nothing but to drag on the proceedings, and as such, the Trial Court has rightly dismissed the petition filed by the petitioners, and this Court finds no grounds to 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.13896 of 2025 interfere with the order passed by the Trial Court.
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. However, the Trial Court is directed to complete the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 30.04.2025 Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation/Yes/No kv To
1. The Inspector of Police, Perumanallur Police Station, Tiruppur.
2. The II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tiruppur
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.13896 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. kv Crl.O.P.No.13896 of 2025 30.04.2025
4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis