IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19950 OF 2016 Between: Kolasani Krishna Kumari, W/o. Major Madhusudhan Rao, Aged: 73 years; Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Chilumuru Village, Kolluru Mandal, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Industries & Commerce (Mines-IV) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. The District Collector & Chairman, District Level Sand Committee, Guntur District, Guntur. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the proceedings R.O.C.No.6491/sand/TP/2015/G-4, dated 25-03- 2016, as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution India as well as Articles 21 and 300-A and consequently to set aside the of proceedings of the 2nd respondent .i?.O,.C.No.6491/sand/TP/2015/G-4, dated 25-03-2016. issued vide A t.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 24491 OF 2016) /' . * Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent issued vide. R.O.C.No.6491/sand/TP/2015/G-4, dated 25-03-2016, forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE The Court made the following order: APHC010841092016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] MONDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19950/2016 / 1 \ Between: Kolasani Krishna Kumari, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal Secretary and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: ...RESPONDENT(S) 1. CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr M.S.P.Reddy, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed. Sd/'SHAIKMOHD. RAFI ASSISTANTREGSSTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTfON OFFICER To. 1. OneCCto Sri. Challa Srinivasa Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Industries & Commerce, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three CD Copies GSC ' > HIGH COURT DATED:06/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.19950 of 2016 17 JUN 1 rrentSectioiLxi' 5- DISMISSING OF THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS