APHC010176212019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7612/2019 Between: 1. SAYEED MOHAMMED ABDULLA QUADRI, S/O. NURULLA QUADRI, 68 YEARS, 0CC RETIRED TEACHER, R/O. H.NO. 45/203-A-57, VENKATA RAMANA COLONY, OPP AP TOURISM, KURNOOL CITY AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI CAPITAL REGION AREA GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT AT KURNOOL. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KURNOOL II TOWN P. S, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. MR GHOUSE MIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETR., MAJOR, R/O. H.NO. 45-12-22/53, OPP BRUNDAVAN APTS., LABOUR COLONY ROAD, ASHOKNAGAR, KURNOOL. 5. SYED SAMAD, S/O. SYED BOYAZID SAHIB, MAJOR, R/O. H.NO. 45-407, ASHOKNAGAR, SAP CAMP POST, NEAR MADINA MASJID, KURNOOL. 6. SYED NIJAMUDDIN QADRI, S/O. SYED IMDAD ALL QUADRI, MAJOR, R/O. H.NO. 45-201-B, ASHOK NAGAR, NAGARJUNA APARTMENT LANE, KURNOOL. 7. SYED MOHAMMED TAHA QUADRI, S/O. SYED YASEEN BASHA QUADRI, MAJOR, R/O. H.NO. 45/24K-58-2, ASHOK NAGAR, KURNOOL. 8. KAMALAPURAM ABDUL AZEEZ, S/O. MAHABOOB SAHEB, MAJOR, R/O. H.NO. 45-24-K25-C1, SRI KURNOOL COLONY, ASHOK NAGAR, KURNOOL ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the discharge of functions of the petitioner as the President of the Al Madeena Masjid Trust at the instance of respondents 4 to 8 yielding to the pressures brought out by them through their political identities even though the dispute was ceased of by a competent civil Court in OS No.43/2019 and directing the petitioner to settle the disputes with them and trying to settle the civil dispute even though he do not have any authority, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of principles of natural justice and established judicial precedents, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere ,with the functioning of the petitioner as the Presidnet of the Al Madeena Masjid and for attending the repairing works of the said Masjid, pending the disposal of the above WP, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. J U M V PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. RAVI KUMAR TOLETY The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7612 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs: <….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the discharge of functions of the petitioner as the President of the AI Madeena Masjid Trust at the instance of respondents 4 to 8 yielding to the pressures brought out by them through political identities even though the dispute was ceased of by a competent civil court in OS No.43 of 2019 and directing the petitioner to settle the disputes with them and trying to settle the civil dispute even though he do not have any authority, as being illegal, arbitrary and is in violation of principles of natural justice and established judicial precedents, and pass…= (in verbatim) 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is in attendance. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submitted that the preliminary investigator and the police would reveal that the dispute in question is purely civil in nature and that they would not interfere with the matter. 4. Heard the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and placed on record the written instructions that the 4 matter is civil in nature. In that view of the matter, no further orders are required in this writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 16th October, 2025 cbn 5 114 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 7612 OF 2019 16th October, 2025 cbn