APHC010142172020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 8578/2020 Between: 1. DEERGHASI NUKAYYA ALIAS NUKAYYA REDDY, FATHER NAME LATE NARAYANA AGE 49 ADDRESS DEERGHASI NUKAYYA @ NUKAYYA REDDY S/O LATE NARAYANA,AGED 49 YEARS, OCC F.P.SHOP DEALER, R/O D.NO. 2-30, REDDIKA VEEDI, MEGHAVARAM VILLAGE, SANTHABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT- 532211. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, /JOINT COLLECTOR SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, SANTHABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT-532195 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 2ndrespondent in cancelling the authorization of the petitioner FP Shop No 0129024 of Meghavaram Village, Santhabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District in SR.No.141/2019-S5 dated 18.12.2019, basing on the report U/Sec.6(A) of the EC Act, 1955 is illegal, arbitrary, violation of Andhra Pradesh State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2018 and violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the proceedings vide SR.No.141/2019-S5 dated 18.12.2019 passed by the 2nd respondent, by permitting the petitioner to supply the Essential Commodities to the eligible card holders from the petitioner’s Fair Price Shop No. 0129024 of Meghavaram Village, Santhabommali Mandal, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER When the matter is taken up today, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 16.09.2025 LSP 234 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 8578/2020 16.09.2025 LSP