Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49246 (RAJ)

CHOTA DEVI WIFE OF LATE SH. JAGDISH BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/889/2025 · 2025-10-27

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42955] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 889/2025 Chota Devi Wife Of Late Sh. Jagdish Bairwa, Resident Of Hardiwalon Ki Dhani, Village Hardyanpura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, M.i. Road, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City (East), Jaipur. 4. Station House Officer, Police Station Kanota, Jaipur City (East), Jaipur. ...Non-Petitioners 5. Rajendra Prasad Mittal Son Of Gangasahay Mittal, Resident Of 6, Krishna Kunj, Rawan Gate, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur. 6. Ramnagar Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti, Jaipur Through Its Secretary Kuldeep Sharma, Address- Ani Public School, 327, Khandelwal Vatika, Agra Road, Jaipur. 7. Ratan Kumar Tiwari Son Of Narayan Tiwari, Resident Of 347, Ganesh Nagar Vistar, Kalwar Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur Sanyojak Ram Nagar Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti (Registration No. 2977/l. 8. Sanjay Jangid Son Of Govind Kumar, Resident Of Kanota, Opposite Bank Of India, Kanota, Jaipur, Rajastan. 9. Sitaram Bairwa Son Of Ramdev, Resident Of Hardi Wale Ki Dhani, Hardyanpura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 10. Rakesh Meena Son Of Fheliram, Resident Of Kanota, Police Station Toonga, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 11. Siyaram Son Of Jagnath, Resident Of Village Dayarampura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. 12. Manish Kumar Son Of Uma Shankar, Resident Of Village Dayarampura, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Babu Khandelwal [2025:RJ-JP:42955] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-889/2025] For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 27/10/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate for redressal of his grievance(s) in view of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of UP and Others: (2008) 2 SCC 409. The criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /56