Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49241 (CHH)

SMT. ALKA SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12282/2025 · 2025-10-27

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:52416 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12282 of 2025 Smt. Alka Sahu W/o Rupesh Kumar Sahu, Aged About 38 Years R/o C-36 Arpa Vihar Colony, Basantpur, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Directorate Of Public Education, Indravati Bhawan, Block 1st Floor, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Collector, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 4 - Joint Director, Education, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.) 6 - Principal, Government Higher Secondary School, Arjuni, Block Akaltara, Janjgir Champa (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Aman Ansari, Advocate For State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 28.10.2025 1. The petitioner who is working as Lecturer (LB) has filed the present writ petition assailing order dated 12.09.2025 passed by Divisional Level Rationalization Committee, in Case No. 564/2025 by which BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2025.10.29 10:38:26 +0530 2 representation of the petitioner has been rejected. The petitioner is also assailing transfer order dated 12.06.2025 passed by respondent No. 2 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Government Higher Secondary School, Arjuni, Akaltara, Janjgir Champa to Government Higher Secondary School, Pathalgaon, Jashpur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he may be allowed to make representation before the State Level Rationalization Committee and would further submit that salary of the petitioner has also not been released. 3. The submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner seems to be just and proper. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make a representation before the State Level Rationalization Committee who will consider and decide the same in accordance with law. 5. The respondents are directed to examine the petitioner’s case with regard to salary and if there is no other impediment in releasing the salary, the same shall be released without any further delay. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika