[2025:RJ-JP:45617] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9154/2025 Ayub @ Mota @ Udal @ Billa S/o Ishab @ Ishav, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Sahshan, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (Currently In Central Jail, Alwar, Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivam Sharma with Mr. Ravi Kumar Yadav for Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 13/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 138/2025 registered at Police Station Neemrana District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2) of the BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that applicant is sole bread earner of the family. It is further submitted that matter is triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that present offence is petty in nature and merely on account of criminal antecedents, applicant is not being granted bail by the learned Trial Court. It is submitted that applicant is in custody from a long period. Furthermore, it is submitted that [2025:RJ-JP:45617] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9154/2025] applicant is ready to abide by the conditions imposed by this Court. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. It is submitted that there are strong criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant and he is threat to society. 4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that recovered quantity of the contraband is less than the commercial quantity; that accused-applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that accused-applicant is in custody from a long period; and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ayub @ Mota @ Udal @ Billa S/o Ishab @ Ishav shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 6. Considering the criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant, this court deems it fit to direct the accused- applicant to reside for a period of six months at a distance of 250 Kms, from the place of his present residence and after completion of the aforesaid condition, applicant is directed to periodically mark [2025:RJ-JP:45617] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9154/2025] attendance at the concerned Police Station once on every 5th of the month at 11.00 AM and give a brief record qua his conduct, while his stay away from is residence. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /19