[2025:RJ-JP:47647] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13884/2022 1. Mahendra Singh Son Of Shri Het Singh, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of Plot No. 84, Jda Colony, Sirsi Road, Bhankrota, Jaipur. 2. Sanjay Kumar Tomar Son Of Shri Shiv Kumar, Resident Of 10, Mahaveer Nagar Vistar, Karatpura, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Department Of Home, To The Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director General And Commandant General, Home Guard Directorate, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Additional Director General Of Police, Home Guard Directorate, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kashyap For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and action of the respondents non granting the benefit of regularization from the date of initial appointment of the petitioners 1.e. 06.09.1984, 11.12.1984 may kindly be declared null, void, illegal and not considering the relief sought by the petitioners in the light of judgments given in similar situated [2025:RJ-JP:47647] (2 of 3) [CW-13884/2022] persons i.e. Smt. Niru Rathore, Sohan Lal Rathi and Ramdev Trivedi also may kindly be declared null and void and the same may be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to grant the relief of regularization from the dates of their initial appointments of the petitioners as mentioned above.” 2. Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC accepts notice on behalf of respondent. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring order dated 30.10.2025 in SB CWP No.4670/2018 titled as Om Prakash Vs. State of Rajasthan submits that the controversy raised herein is already been decided by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur, therefore the instant writ petition be decided in accordance with directions in case of State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjawal (DB Special Appeal Writ No.532/2016) decided on 12.02.2014. 4. Learned counsel for respondent submits that if the ratio is applicable, they will consider the representation. 5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under [2025:RJ-JP:47647] (3 of 3) [CW-13884/2022] an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /370