IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.20977 of 2025 Maunabati Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. P. Panda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 19.09.2025 I.A. No.16823 of 2025 05. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. This I.A. has been filed seeking modification of the order dtd.11.09.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.20977 of 2025. 4. It is contended that this Court while disposing the matter directed Opposite Party No.3 to accept the original experience certificate available under Annexure-3 and to provide appointment to the Petitioner. p. 2 p. 2 4.1. It is contended that in fact Opposite Party No.2 is competent to implement the order passed by this Court on 11.09.2025. 4.2. Accordingly, it is contended that instead of Opposite Party No.3, Opposite Party No.2 be directed to do the needful in terms of the order dtd.11.09.2025. 5. Learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State has no serious objection to the course of action proposed. 6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties and considering the submissions made, this Court in modification of order dtd.11.09.2025, directs Opposite Party No.2 to do the needful as directed in place of Opposite Party No.3. 7. Accordingly, the I.A stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat