Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4923 (UTT)

MILKHA SINGH AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/510/2025 · 2025-10-14

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9170 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/510/2025 With WPSS/512/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Kundan Singh, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, Deputy Advocate General for the State. 2. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, therefore they are heard together and are being decided by a common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of Writ Petition No. 510 of 2025 (SS) alone are being discussed and considered. 3. Petitioners are serving as tube-well operators in Tube-well Division, Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. According to them, tube-well operators, serving in Tube-well Division, Roorkee, are being paid vehicle allowance @ Rs. 2000/- per month, while tube- well operators, who are serving in Bazpur are being paid only Rs. 1200/- per month. 4. In Writ Petition No. 510 of 2025 (SS), petitioners have sought following relief. “Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to forthwith pay the amount of vehicle allowances to the petitioners on enhance rate i.e. Rs. 2000/- per month w.e.f. 01.01.2024 alongwith interest, as per directions contained in 2025:UHC:9170 office order dated 13.12.2023 issued by Additional Secretary, Government of Uttarakhand (contained as Annexure no. 1 to this writ petition).” 5. In support of their contention that they are entitled to Rs. 2000/- a month, as vehicle allowance, petitioners have relied upon a Government Order dated 13.12.2023. 6. Learned State Counsel submits that if petitioners have any grievance, then they could have approached the competent authority before rushing to this Court. 7. The writ petitions are, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioners to make representation before the Chief Engineer, Level- 1 (HOD), Irrigation Department, within three weeks from today. 8. If petitioners make such representation within stipulated time, the Chief Engineer concerned shall examine the matter and pass appropriate order, as per law, within four months thereafter. 9. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 14.10.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031 a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626 D305B1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.10.14 19:01:58 +05'30'