1 2025:CGHC:52641-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2473 of 2023 1 - Sudhakar Vinayak Rao Hood S/o Vinayak Rao Aged About 60 Years R/o D-18, Row House, Pyramid City Four, Ghogali, District - Nagpur-37, State Maharashtra (Hood Spelled Wrongly As Hud In The Charge- Sheet) 2 - Sulabha Sudhakar W/o Sudhakar Vinayak Rao Aged About 57 Years R/o D-18, Row House, Pyramid City Four, Ghogali, District - Nagpur-37, State Maharashtra 3 - Ritika Babre W/o Ankit Babre Aged About 29 Years R/o Taluka Selu, Wardha Police Station, Ward No. 01, Near Dipakchand School, Tahsil Selu And District - Wardha, State - Maharashtra ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through SHO- PS Mahila Thana, Sector 6, Bhilai District - Durg Chhattisgarh 2 - Supriya Sinha D/o Kamta Sinha Aged About 30 Years R/o 602/B, Palmwood Residency, Street-3, Katulbod, Motilal Nehru Marg, Bhilai, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 490020 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Aman Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No.1-State : Mr.S.S.Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR 2 Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 29.10.2025 1. Heard Mr.Aman Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Mr.S.S.Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.1/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of the CrPC with the following prayers :- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present petition by setting aside chargesheet bearing No. 86 of 2023 dated 07.09.2023 pending before the Civil Judge and Magistrate Court, Durg, arising out of FIR bearing No. 80 of 2023 registered at PS Mahila Thana, District Durg (CG) for offences punishable under section 498A r/w 34 of IPC and grant any other relief to which the petitioners are entitled to.” 3. It transpires from the order-sheet that there is no interim order passed by learned Single Bench of this Court on 31.10.2023 and further no notice was issued to respondent No.2 in the present case. Though the dispute is matrimonial in nature, but the husband who is co-accused in the present case has not been made as party and the petitioners are family members. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the present petition 3 may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh if the matter still survives and trial has not been concluded. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu