Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49220 (ALL)

NANDINI v. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/16416/2025 · 2025-05-20

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:85831-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 16416 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nandini Respondent :- District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.B. Singh,Rakesh Kumar Pal Counsel for Respondent :- Rahul Chaudhary Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard Sri Surendra Nath Yadav, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri R.B. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Mayank Singh Nagaur, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, the Finance Company. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1, the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Prayagraj, to decide Complaint Case No. 182 of 2024 [Nandini Vs. Mahendra and Mahendra Financial Services and Another], made under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, within a stipulated time period. 3. We are of the view that this writ petition is premature in nature as the complaint case has been filed in the year 2024 and directions have been passed by the authority concerned. 4. In light of the same, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to file an application before the authority concerned for expeditious disposal of the complaint case. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Arun K. Singh [Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J.] [Shekhar B. Saraf, J.] Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad