DURGA PRASAD SON OF LATE SHRI BHAGWAN DAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/6947/2023 · 2025-11-26
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49214 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49214 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6947/2023
1. Durga Prasad Son of Late Shri Bhagwan Das, Resident of 8, Block Keshavpura, Bhankrota, Jaipur (West), Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Uchchhav Kanwar Wife of Shri Durga Prasad, Resident of 8, Block Keshavpura, Bhankrota, Jaipur (West), Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P
2. Guddi Devi Wife of Shri Hari Singh Bariwa, Reident of 435, Nirman Nagar, Shya Nagar, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2989/2025
1. Uchchhav Kanwar Wife of Shri Durga Prasad, Resident of 8, C-Block, Azad Nagar, Keshavpura, Bhankrota, Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (West), Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. Anita Kanwar Wife of Shri Shekhar Singh, Resident of 8, C-Block, Azad Nagar, Keshavpura, Bhankrota, Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (West), Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Hari Singh Bairwa Son of Shri Motiram, Resident of 8, Block-C, Kesupura, Bhankrota, Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sameer Dinesh Kiradia Mr. Moolchand Chandel Mr. Khushboo
(2 of 3) [CRLMP-6947/2023] Mr. Saurabh Aswal Mr. Ajay Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-PP Mr. Yash Thakhar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 26/11/2025
1. Two different FIRs bearing Nos. 367/2023 and 75/2025 have been registered by the complainants with the Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (West) wherein the parties have settled their dispute by entering into the compromise. 2. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court, the parties have appeared before the Investigating Officer for verification of the compromise and the Investigating Officer has verified the contents of compromise. 3. Considering the above factual aspects of the matter and looking to the fact that the allegations levelled in the FIRs by the complainants are of a personal nature and the complainants do not want to prosecute the petitioners and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr. reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and Ors. reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688, this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS. 4. Accordingly, both criminal misc. petitions stand allowed. The proceedings arising out of impugned FIR Nos.
367/2023 and
(3 of 3) [CRLMP-6947/2023] 75/2025 registered with Police Station Bhankrota, Jaipur (West) stand quashed. 5. Stay applications as well as all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/11-12