[2025:RJ-JP:42316] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15859/2025 Shri Shankar Lal Sharma, Son Of Late Shri Suraj Narayan Sharma, Aged About 74 Years, Residing At Plot 89, Ward No. 28, Vaibhav Laxmi Complex, Reengus Road, Pakka Bandha, Chomu, Jaipur 303702, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Public Works Department (Pwd), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Chief Engineer, Pwd, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 4. The Director, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Government Of Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Bhardhar Mr. Suresh Bairwa For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 15/10/2025 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction directing the Respondents forthwith release all retiral dues of the Petitioner, including but not limited to Provident Fund, Insurance. Gratuity, P.L. Encashment, outstanding salary arrears, and pension, along with all consequential benefits within reasonable time as and when Hon'ble [2025:RJ-JP:42316] (2 of 3) [CW-15859/2025] Court thinks deem fit from the passing of this Order. b) Further, direct the Respondents to furnish complete service records of the Petitioner, including Service Book, transfer orders, promotion orders, and release orders within reasonable time as and when Hon'ble Court thinks deem fit from the passing of this Order. c) Further, direct Respondents to pay interest at an appropriate rate on all delayed payments from the date of entitlement till realization within reasonable time as and when Hon'ble Court thinks deem fit from the passing of this Order. d) Any other writ order or direction which may be deemed proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be issued in favour of petitioners.” 3. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his [2025:RJ-JP:42316] (3 of 3) [CW-15859/2025] representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/177