[2025:RJ-JP:43593] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16274/2025 Ramjilal S/o Shri Rampalharijan, R/o Mukam Post Bagdi And Lalsot District Dausa, Rajasthan, Presently Working As Class Iv Sarvant, Samudayikchikitsa Kendra, Bagdi, Dausa. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Near Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 30/10/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and: A. By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to regularized services of petitioner on the post of Class-IV Servant/ respondent be directed to decide the petitioner representation on merit as early as possible. B. Any other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper be also be passed in favour of petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while placing reliance upon judgment in case of Dharam Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr. (Civil Appeal No. 8558/2018) decided on 19.08.2025 by Hon’ble Supreme Court and further relied by a Co-ordinate Bench in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14912/2024 Omprakash & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors., order dated 23.09.2025 submits that the present petitioner is working as [2025:RJ-JP:43593] (2 of 2) [CW-16274/2025] Sweeper in the respondent department for last 33 years and he has requested for regularization of his services in wake of direction issued by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of Dharam Singh (supra) and State of Karnataka & Ors. Vs. Umadevi & Ors. (2006) 4 SCC 1. 3. Considering submissions of learned counsel for petitioner, it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by affording an opportunity of submitting a representation and direction to the respondent(s) to consider and decide the representation in light of judgments in case of Dharam Singh (supra) and Uma Devi (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /53