[2025:RJ-JP:48271] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13369/2025 Deepak Kumar Meena S/o Shri Bhagwan Sahai Meena, R/o Ward No. 2, Hodyali, Samel, Lalsot District Dausa (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena Mr. Adarsh Singhal, Amicus Curiae For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Sugan Singh, Dy. S. P., Cyber Crime Police Station, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 27/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 06/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber Crime Jaipur for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of BNS, Section 43, 66(c), 66(d) of IT Act and Section 42(3) of Telecommunication Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is a young man aged 21 years. It is submitted that co-accused has been enlarged on bail. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Investigating Officer has marked presence in the Court and has submitted that present offence is committed in an organized manner wherein AADHAR Card, PAN Card and other details are fabricated and forged. It is submitted [2025:RJ-JP:48271] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13369/2025] that accused-applicant at the age of 19 years, is committing such offences. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that present offences are committed in an organized manner; that that facts of the present case are not exceptional in order to consider the same for grant of bail under Section 482 of BNSS and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused- applicant. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /23