[2025:RJ-JP:49487] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18975/2025 1. Manjeet Singh S/o Shri Mehar Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Baman Vaadi, Kaman, District Deeg 2. Jallo S/o Shri Jeevaram, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Nagla Harnarayan (Pachol), Kaman, District Deeg 3. Innas S/o Shri Sahab Khan, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Haltana, Pahari, District Deeg (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Primary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director (Elementary Education), Bikaner. 3. The Commissioner Rajasthan Counsil For Elementary Education (Dpet/serva Shiksha Abhiyan), Radhakrishnan Shiksha Shankul, 5Th Block, 2Nd And 3Rd Floor, Opposite O.t.s. Puliya, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priyanka Paliwal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “It is therefore, respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleaded to accept and allow this writ petition and by an appropriate writ, or direction:- 1. The respondents may kindly be directed to adjust under any scheme as helper or Class-IV status be treating them as qualified Instructor. [2025:RJ-JP:49487] (2 of 3) [CW-18975/2025] 2. Any other order which this Hon’ble Court deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 23.01.2018 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.525/2007 titled as Rajasthan Council for Elementary Education(DPET/ Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan) & Anr. Vs. Veerbhadra Singh Sisodiya & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by this Hon’ble Court ratio laid down in case of Rajasthan Council for Elementary Education (supra). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid ratio. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of ratio laid down in case of Rajasthan Council for Elementary Education (supra) passed by this Court. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Rajasthan Council for Elementary Education (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners [2025:RJ-JP:49487] (3 of 3) [CW-18975/2025] either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioners, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /32