1 / 2 2025:CGHC:53632 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1076 of 2025 Ramprasad S/o. Khetu Ram Soni, Aged About 55 Years R/o. Village Banjari Nagar Rawabhata Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of C.G Through - Station House Officer, Police Station Pandri, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Mohan Nayak S/o Hiralal Nayak Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Hudki Dadar Godpara, P.S. Jharband, District Bargarh (Orissa) Now R/o Dubey Colony, Beside Sai Temple, House Of Billu Thakur, P.S. Pandari, District Raipur C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Rishabh Gupta, Advocate For State /Respondent No.1 : Mr. Ajit Singh, GA For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Vivek Mishra, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 03/11/2025 1. At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the learned Special Judge, NDPS, Raipur, has already passed the judgment in Criminal Case No.24/2025. ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.11.04 18:28:05 +0530 2 / 2 2. Since the instant petition is for interim custody of the vehicle, however, the trial Court has already passed the judgment, therefore, the application for interim custody of the vehicle is not maintainable by way of the criminal revision and the appeal would lie against the order passed by the trial Court under Section 452 of the Cr.P.C., therefore, the instant revision has become infructuous. 3. In view of this, the instant revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to prefer the necessary appeal. SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu