BAJINATH MAHATO v. TARUN KUMAR BHATTACHARYYA ALIAS TARUN BHATTACHARYYA
CPAN/1717/2023 · 2025-06-13
Saugata Bhattacharyya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49199 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 49199 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
ML 2472 1133..0066..22002255 Ct. No. 18
adeb
CPAN 1717 of 2023 In W.P.A. 1169 of 2016
Baijnath Mahato Vs. Tarun Kumar Bhattacharyya @ Tarun Bhattacharyya & Anr.
Mr. Sukumar Ghosh Mr. Moumita Ghosh
…for the Applicant
Mr. Ayan Banerjee Ms. Debasree Dhamali Ms. Riya Ghosh
…for the contemnors
Learned advocates representing the alleged contemnors submit that order passed by this Court on 16th May, 2023 has been complied with upon making payment of Rs. 55795/- to the petitioner. However, quantification of the amount payable to the petitioner in terms of the order dated 16th May, 2023 is disputed by the learned advocate representing the petitioner. Statement showing calculation of the sum which was found payable to the petitioner in terms of order dated 16th May, 2023 is placed before this Court and same is taken on record. In view of payment made by the alleged contemnors contempt application stands disposed of and contempt proceeding stands dropped.
2 However this order shall not preclude the petitioner to take steps in accordance with the law questioning quantification made by the alleged contemnors for making payment. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.
(Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)