1 APHC010368212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1887/2025 Between: 1. KONDRU VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O APPARAO, AGED 36 YRS, OCC FAIR PRICE SHOP DEALER, D.NO.6- 28, ADITYA NAGAR COLONY,ARASAVAIII, SRIKAKULAM AND R/AT D.NO.6-28 KHAJIPETA, ARASAVILLI (RURAL), SRIKAKULAM 532401 ...PETITIONER AND 1. SAI PRATHYUSHA, W/O NOT KNOWN. AGED 45 YRS REVENUE DIVISIONAI OFFICER (RDO) R.D.O., OFFICE, SRIKAKUIAM. 2. FARMAN AHMED KHANDISMISSED, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER AGED 50 YRS. JOINT COIEICTOR JOINT COIIECTOR OFFICE, SRIKAKUIAM. THIS CONTEMPT CASE NO 1887 OF 2025 IS DISMISSED AGAINST RESPONDENT NO2 AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 25.07.2025 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file 2 herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take action against the Respondents 1 and 2 Under the Contemt of Counrs Act for their wiifui, disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.14597/2025 dt.23-06-2025 inspite of notice dt.09-07- 2025 issued before initiating action but not compiied the Order of this Honble Court Consequently impose appropriate Sentence of Imprisonment and fine in acordance with Law by Ailoiwng the Contempt Case in the interest of the justice and pass000000000..1 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R SIVA SAI SWARUP Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU 3 The Court made the following order: On 19.09.2025, the counsel for the respondent placed before this Court the proceedings dated 19.09.2025 issued by the respondent-contemnor and submitted that the order under contempt is complied with. Upon which the counsel for the petitioner took time to get instructions in the matter. 2. On 25.09.2025, the petitioner counsel submitted that the proceedings dated 19.09.2025 issued by the contemnor was only to get over the contempt case and the said proceedings remained on paper without implementing the same. Thereafter, the matter was passed over for getting instructions. When the matter was again taken up for hearing the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order under contempt was complied with. In those circumstances, the respondent-contemnor was directed to file affidavit explaining the reasons for the delay in complying with the order under contempt. 3. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the respondent-contemnor filed affidavit explaining the reasons. In view of the explanation offered by the respondent-contemnor coupled with the fact that the order under contempt is complied 4 with, no further orders are necessary in the present contempt case and accordingly the same is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dt.16.10.2025 DSB 5 61 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CC No.1887 of 2025 Date 16.10.2025 U DSB