[2025:RJ-JP:49764] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18953/2025 1. Soni D/o Shri Chaub Singh, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Diholi Tehsil Rajakhed, Dholpur, Rajasthan, Currently Working As A Cook At The Government Devnarayan Obc Hostel, Sepau, Dholpur District Rajasthan. 2. Pintu S/o Shri Veeri Singh, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Karial Wale Syed, Dholpur District, Rajasthan, Currently A Watchman At The Government Ambedkar Hostel-1, Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Near 22 Godam Bridge, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Director, Social Justice And Empowerment Department, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Chander Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 05/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “It is therefore, respectfully prayed that your Lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and: A. By an appropriate, writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to regularized services of [2025:RJ-JP:49764] (2 of 3) [CW-18953/2025] Petitioner on the post of Class-IV Servant/respondent be directed to decide the Petitioner representation on Merit as early as possible.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 29.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8332/2002 titled as Nawal Kishore Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh & Ors. Vs. State of U.P. & Anr. (Civil Appeal No.8558/2018 decided on 19.08.2025), by Hon’ble Supreme Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh (supra) and followed in case of Nawal Kishore Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Dharam Singh (supra), followed by this Court in case of Nawal Kishore (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the [2025:RJ-JP:49764] (3 of 3) [CW-18953/2025] decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E- mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioners, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /43