Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49192 (RAJ)

KAMALKANT SHARMA CT (DRIVER) NO. 62 v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9366/2019 · 2025-12-17

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51280] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9366/2019 Kamalkant Sharma Ct (Driver) No. 62, Aged About 52 Years, S/o Shri Pyare Lal Sharma, R/o House No. 149, Near Kali Ki Bagichi, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Finance (Rules), Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Secretary (Home), Ministry Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Inspector General Of Police, Bharatpur Range, Bharatpur. 4. Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Soumitra Chaturvedi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 17/12/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner in relation to a matter of financial loss due to non grant of benefit of second and third selection scale (Technical) and fixation of salary in the Rajasthan Civil Services (revised Pay) Rules, 2008. 2. Considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner as well learned counsel for State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the controversy and issue raised by petitioner, herein is already settled by a Co- ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court by order dated 28.08.2025 in [2025:RJ-JP:51280] (2 of 2) [CW-9366/2019] S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12949/2025 titled as Ravindra Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. He also submits that the matter is squarely covered by the controversy already set to rest by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Amar Singh and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3873/2019 order dated 20.12.2023. 4. In view of above, where both the counsels agreed that the issue involved in the instant writ petition is covered by the aforesaid judgments, therefore, the instant writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the relief granted by this court in the case of Amar Singh (supra) shall also be extended to the petitioner in the instant writ petition, after examination of his case, if squarely applicable, upon the facts as mentioned in the petition. 5. Instant writ petition and pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /175