PRITAM SINGH v. SHEIKH MUSHTAQ AHMED,SECY.GAD.AND ANR.
CPSW/143/2013 · 2025-07-14
Ma Chowdhary
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4919 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4919 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 143/2013 in SWP No. 1394/2010 IA No. 99001/2014
Pritam Singh
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
Sheikh Mushtaq Ahmed & Anr. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M A CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (14.07.2025)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite indicating the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner in the cause list. It appears that the order sought to be enforced may have been implemented during the pendency of this petition as such, petitioner has chosen not to come present in the Court to prosecute the case. Be that as it may, the instant contempt petition is disposed of and the proceedings are dropped, however, the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek revival/restoration of the petition, in case, cause survives.
(M A CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
Jammu 14.07.2025 Diksha
Serial No. 13