- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41688 CRP No. 235 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.235 OF 2024 (SC) BETWEEN: SRI RAMESH BABU S/O RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO.573, SREEKANTAPURA, ANCHEPALYA, NAGASANDRA POST, TUMKUR ROAD, BENGALURU -560 073 …PETITIONER (BY SRI JEEVAN K, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI Y J BRAMHA KUMAR S/O LATE JETTAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT SRIKANTAPURA, ANCHEPALYA, NAGASANDRA, BENGALURU NORTH, BENGALURU -560 076 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI ARUN KUMAR D N, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 18 OF THE KARNATAKA SMALL CAUSES COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.01.2024 PASSED IN SC No.617/2023 ON THE FILE OF VIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE AND ACMM, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY. Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41688 CRP No. 235 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Parties are present. They submit application under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC signed by the parties and their respective advocates. 2. Application under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC reads as under: “That the parties have amicably settled the matter out of Court. That the respondent has agreed to receive the amount of Rs.1,68,000/- deposited before this Hon’ble Court along with the interest accrued herein. In view of settlement between the parties the above revision petition may kindly be closed recording the same in the interest of justice.” 3. Contents of the application read over to the parties and they agreed that the contents of the application are true and correct. 4. Accordingly, the following: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41688 CRP No. 235 of 2024 ORDER (i) Revision petition stands disposed of in terms of the application. (ii) Office is directed to pass modified decree in terms of the application, appending the copy of the application as part of the decree. (iii) Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the respondent under due identification with accrued interest. (iv) Refund of permissible Court fee is allowed. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR