Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49184 (RAJ)

HARI SINGH SEVADA S/O SUKHDEVARAM v. RANVIR SINGH S/O KISHOR SINGH

CRES/888/2024 · 2025-11-28

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48800] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 888/2024 In S.B. Misc. Appeal No. 2833/2019 1. Hari Singh Sevada S/o Sukhdevaram, Aged About 50 Years 2. Smt. Manju Devi W/o Hari Singh, Aged About 46 Years, All R/o Village Kishanpura, Tehsil Dantaramgarh, District Sikar (Raj). ----Applicant Versus 1. Ranvir Singh S/o Kishor Singh, R/o Khanadi, P.s. Losal, District Sikar (Raj). (Vehicle Driver Vehicle Mini Bus No. RJ 23 PA 6119). 2. Bhanwar Singh S/o Jeevan Singh, R/o Aaguni Kotdi Village Dujod, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj). (Registered Owner Vehicle Mini Bus No. RJ 23 PA 6119). 3. United India Insurance Company Ltd., Through Branch Manager, Local Branch, Jaipur Road, Sikar, (Raj), ( Insurance Company Vehicle Mini Bus No. RJ 23 PA 6119) ----Respondents For Applicant(s) : Mr. Akshat Choudhary, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 28/11/2025 1. The present civil restoration application has been filed by the applicants for restoration of S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2833/2019, which has been dismissed by the Registrar (Judicial) vide order dated 26.07.2024 in compliance of the peremptory order passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 19.02.2024. [2025:RJ-JP:48800] (2 of 2) [CRES-888/2024] 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants want to contest the petition on merits, therefore, the application be allowed and the appeal be restored to its original number. 3. Heard counsel for the applicants. 4. For the reasons mentioned therein, the application is allowed and S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2833/2019 is restored to its original number. 5. Office to proceed. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /74