APHC010100252025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5621/2025 Between: 1. BATHULA VENKATA RAMANA, W/O VENKATA REDDY, AGE 45 YEARS, RESIDENT OF D. NO. 2-103, HIGH SCHOOL, GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE, MYLAVARAM MANDAL, N.T.R DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE AT MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, MYLAVARAM DIVISION, NTR COMMISSIONERATE, MYLAVARAM. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MYLAVARAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BANKA NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the Respondents No. 3 to 5 in not removing the Rowdy Sheet vide C.No.290-28/DCRB/2012, dt. 02.02.2013 and continuing the same, even there are no cases are pending against the petitioner which is illegal and unlawful. The petitioner begs to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Hon'ble High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India” 2 2. Heard Sri B.Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that no cases are pending against the petitioner. It is further stated that, to curb and curtail the unlawful activities of the Petitioner in the vicinity, Rowdy Sheet was opened against the Petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, the cases registered against the Petitioner were ended in acquittal and no cases are pending against her. 5. Considering the submissions made, and as no material has been placed before this Court to show that the petitioner’s activities are prejudicial to the maintenance of public order or affecting peace and tranquility in the area, the writ petition is allowed and the Rowdy Sheet opened against the petitioner vide proceedings C.No.290-28/DCRB/2012, dated 02.02.2013, is hereby set aside. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.12.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.5621 of 2025 Dt.10.12.2025 Asr