Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49181 (AP)

MEKALA RAMA SUBBAIAH v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/11965/2025 · 2025-05-05

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11965 OF 2025 Between: 1. Sri Mekala Rama Subbaiah, S/o. Mekala Subbarayudu, Aged about 50 years, Occ: Agriculture, Resident of D.No.1-22-1, Ganugapenta Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 2. Sri Mekala Naga Subbaiah, S/o Mekala Subbarayudu, Aged about 46 years, Occ; Teacher, Resident of D.No.1-22, Ganugapenta Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, YSR Kadapa District at Kadapa. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Porumamilla Police Station, YSR Kadapa District. 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, Porumamilla Police Station, YSR Kadapa District. 5. Sri Mekala Jayaram @ Jayanna, S/o Subbaramaiah, Aged about 49 years, OccAgriculture, Resident of Ganugapenta village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 6. Sri Thumma Malakondaiah, S/o Kondaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ Agriculture, Resident of Ganugapenta village, Porumamilla Mandal, . YSR Kadapa District. 7. Smt. Thumma Subbamma, W/o Malakondaiah Aged about 51 years Occ Agriculture, Resident of Ganugapenta village, Porumamilla YSR Kadapa District. Mandal, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue Writ may or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the respondents 3 and 4 in threatening the petitioners with dire consequences with the instigation of respondents 5 to 7 with regard to the property admeasuring Ac.0.26 oents out of 0.52 cents out of totai an extent of extent of Ac. 1.57 cents in Sy.No.465, situated in Ganugapenta village, Porumamilla Mandal Kadapa District is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and without jurisdiction and also violation of principles of natural Justice and YSR consequently direct the peaceful possession and respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the enjoyment of the above mentioned property. lA NO: 1 OF 209R Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.26 cents out of 0.52 cents out of total extent of Ac. situated in Ganugapenta village, Porumamilla Mandal at the behest of the respondents 5 to 7, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable Court. 1.57 cents in Sy.No.465, YSR Kadapa District Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 to 7:-— The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010228012025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11965/2025 [3457] Between: Mekala Rama Subbaiah and Others ...PETmONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) v:’ / r/ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH. WRIT PETITION N0.11965 OF 7n?t; N ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent Nos.3 and 4 at the behest of respondent Nos.5 to 7 disturbing the peace of the petitioner and that they are trying to settle the civil disputes between the petitioners and unofficial respondents by calling the petitioners to the police station repeatedly. 2. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the State not interfering with the civil submits that the respondents 3 and 4 disputes are pending between the parties. 3. Considering the same, the respondents 3 and 4 are are hereby directed not not to interfere with the petitioners an.d the unofficial to disturb the peace of the petitioners and also civil disputes pending between the respondents without following the due process of law. With these Observations, the writ petition is disposed off. No costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- K. TATA RA DEPUTY REGI^AR O //TRUE COPY// SECTfkl OFFICER To 1- The Principal Secretary, Department of Amaravathi. 2. The Superintendent of Police, 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, District. 4. The Sub Inspector of Police, District. Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, YSR Kadapa District at Kadapa. Porumamilla Police Station, YSR Kadapa Porumamilla Police Station, YSR Kadapa Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh 7. Three CD Copies. 5. One CC to Sri Vutupalli Rajanna, [OUT] ssb HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 1 ORDER WP.No.11965 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS