Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 49176 (RAJ)

M/S NAVEEN LOGISTICS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16960/2025 · 2025-11-19

Sanjeet Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46701] (1 of 3) [CW-16960/2025] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16960/2025 M/s Naveen Logistics, Naveen Market, Naveen Logistics, Bhiwadi, Road, Bhiwadi Ind., Bhiwadi,alwar, Rajasthan - 301019, Through Its Owner/sole Proprietor Mr. Naveen Dayma S/o Shri Naresh Dayma, Residing At House No.-13, Hadiya Mohalla, Saidpur Bhiwadi, Amlaki, Bhiwadi Ind. Area, Alwar, Rajasthan- 301019. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Police Directorate, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Cyber Crime Team, Deputy Commissioner Of Police, M2 Mm Colony Police Station, Chennai, Tamil Nadu. 3. Branch Manager, HDFC Bank Ltd.,branch- Bhiwadi II (Branch Code- 2249), Lambardar Tower, Shop No. A-18- C, Bhiwadi, Rajasthan - 301019. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Inderjeet Deora, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naman Yadav, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 19/11/2025 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “(i).Direct the respondent Bank to immediately un-freeze the Current Account of the petitioner bearing Account No.50200033491208, IFSC Code: HDFC0002249 maintained with HDFC Bank Ltd., Branch- Bhiwadi II, Lambardar Tower, Bhiwadi; (ii).Direct the Respondent Bank to provide written reasons for the freezing of the account and any communication received from Cyber Crime Authorities, if any; (iii). Award the cost of litigation in favour of the petitioner; [2025:RJ-JP:46701] (2 of 3) [CW-16960/2025] (iv). Any other relief as may be deemed just and proper for meeting the ends of justice may also be granted in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not misused his bank account for the purpose of illegal transaction and he has not committed any Cyber Crime. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigating agency. He, therefore, prays that the disputed amount, which has been received in the petitioner’s bank account No. 50200033491208, maintained with HDFC Bank Ltd., Branch-Bhiwadi-II, Bhiwadi may be withheld and he may be allowed to operate the bank account, he is facing problem in day to day money transaction. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent does not oppose the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. In view of the submissions made before this Court, the direction is issued to the respondent-bank to de-freeze the saving account No. 50200033491208, maintained with HDFC Bank Ltd., Branch-Bhiwadi-II, Bhiwadi. However, the disputed amount i.e. Rs.50,000/- or any other amount as intimated by the investigation agency, which has been credited in the petitioner’s account in connection with fraudulent transactions shall remain freezed. It is further made clear that keeping the disputed amount aside the petitioner will be allowed to operate his aforementioned savings account for day to day money transactions. It is further directed that only the disputed amount i.e. Rs.50,000/- or any other amount as intimated by the investigation agency, which has been alleged to have been credited in the petitioner’s account shall be freezed in the account of the petitioner and he will be allowed to operate his account. [2025:RJ-JP:46701] (3 of 3) [CW-16960/2025] 6. It is made clear that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigating officer and he will appear before investigating agency as and when required. It is also ordered that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue his above mentioned bank account with the respondent- bank till the investigation is completed by the investigating agency. It is also made clear that in case, after the investigation, the involvement of the petitioner is found in any illegal transaction, the investigating agency would be free to proceed against the petitioner in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of. 8. Stay application and other application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J AVINASH GULERIA /133